After Disappointments.That is the decision.

traditions  values for race identies

massive Revival of  Traditions ,Cultures,religions.

pub by Chitimkulu Traditionalist G Mlalazi

https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=-8yP654zEKM&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DF_1wlUSLBpE%26feature%3Dshare

MAGNIFICENT BLACK hISTORY

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CE0QFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.beforebc.de%2Fall_europe%2F126WebPagesOnEurope.html&ei=h45MVZCfCeeC7ga-x4CQDA&usg=AFQjCNHbJNG8ShWt-LuprwPj8NKjxTSkYw

That is how black Jesus was wearing his Head scarf when he about to be caught by the Roman Warriors to be hanged.. How are we going to identify him because they look alike.

HIDDEN BLACK HISTORY IS RELIGION

BLACK HISTORY IS ORIGINAL RELIGION

Whites blew off the Africoid nose of the Sphinx! ­and destroyed much ancient Africoid art and archives

. Carved from solid rock, the Sphinx portrays an Afrikan Pharaoh. The nose is missing because Europeans (Napoleon's soldiers), in an effort to obscure powerful, blatant, undeniable evidence of Black Afrikan achievement, blew off the broad Africoid nose and part of the generous lips with cannon fire! The Los Angeles Times (June 4, 1990) actually reported that "When Napoleon visited the Sphinx in 1798, everything but the head was buried in sand...his soldiers reputedly used the Sphinx for target practice." While the Sphinx had already suffered nose damage prior to Napoleon, the greatest destruction took place during Napoleon's occupation of Egypt, as documented by Tony Browder, and testified by the collection of Sphinx portraits he has assembled on page 225 of his book Nile Valley Contributions to Civilization. These six portraits, drawn over a period of 100 years from 1698 to 1798, are the only current evidence available which shows the progression of the nose destruction. Besides the Sphinx, a large percentage of Africoid Kamite statues are missing their noses, whereas European-looking figures are intact. Faces of Africoid sculptures were also altered to appear Caucasoid by Kamit's European conquerors. A Sphinx statue on display in the British Museum actually admits that the "face of the stature was reworked" during the Roman occupation of Egypt. Reporting on the "riddle" of the racial identity of the ancient Egyptians, Count C. Volney, a distinguished French scholar who visited Egypt in the late 1700s, wrote with astonishment "...when I visited the Sphinx, its appearance gave me the key to the riddle. Beholding that head typically Negro in all its features..." He later added "...the Egyptians were true Negroes of the same type as all native-born Africans." The Sphinx's broad nose, full lips, and prognathism are evident in an early drawing of the Sphinx as it was found by the French in the late 1700s. Their white plaster fell off centuries later, exposing the blacked-out truth Tired from the hard work of defacing inumerable Afrikan monuments, whites covered them with plaster which fell off centuries later...exposing the stone evidence. Solid stone endures, but plaster and stucco are impermanent and will crack off in time ­to expose what they have been hiding and, to the chagrin of the guilty, perfectly preserving for future generations to witness. The Afrikans of the Nile Valley had built their temples so well, even carving many out of solid rock, that it was often impossible to destroy them. Whites hadn't developed the use of dynamite yet, so they attempted destruction through manually chiseling away at the stone evidence in their campaigns of cultural destruction. This work proved not only ineffective, but too hard and exhausting, particularly under the desert sun, so they resorted to other methods. On pages 165-166 of The Historical Jesus, and the Mythical Christ, historian Gerald Massey reports the coverups perpetrated by European cultural criminals: "In some of the ancient Egyptian temples the Christian iconoclasts, when tired with hacking and hewing at the symbolic figures incised in the chambers of imagery, and defacing the most prominent features OF THE MONUMENTS, FOUND THEY COULD NOT DIG OUT THE HIEROGLYPHICS, AND TOOK TO COVERING them over with plaster; and this plaster, intended to hide the meaning and stop the mouth of the stone word, has served to preserved the ancient writings as fresh in hue and sharp in outline as when they were first cut and colored." Similarly, he continues, the temples were invaded and taken over "by connivance of Roman power." But these temples were enduring, "not built but quarried out the solid rock." The Europeans covered the front of these temples with white stucco and later reopened them as Christian churches. "And all the time each nook and corner was darkly alive with the presence and proofs of the earlier gods, even though the hieroglyphics remained unread. But stucco is not for lasting wear ; it cracks and crumbles, sloughs off, and slinks away into its natal insignificance; the rock is the sole true foundation, the rock is the record in which we reach reality at last." The stone indeed was the truth, and like the truth, it endured; but the plaster was a lie, and lies never have permanence. All the lies and layers of lies perpetrated and refined by successive generations of dishonest Europeans are fated for the same destiny as the stucco plaster. Page 24 Their white plaster fell off centuries later, exposing the blacked-out truth Tired from the hard work of defacing inumerable Afrikan monuments, whites covered them with plaster which fell off centuries later...exposing the stone evidence. Solid stone endures, but plaster and stucco are impermanent and will crack off in time ­to expose what they have been hiding and, to the chagrin of the guilty, perfectly preserving for future generations to witness. The Afrikans of the Nile Valley had built their temples so well, even carving many out of solid rock, that it was often impossible to destroy them. Whites hadn't developed the use of dynamite yet, so they attempted destruction through manually chiseling away at the stone evidence in their campaigns of cultural destruction. This work proved not only ineffective, but too hard and exhausting, particularly under the desert sun, so they resorted to other methods. On pages 165-166 of The Historical Jesus, and the Mythical Christ, historian Gerald Massey reports the coverups perpetrated by European cultural criminals: "In some of the ancient Egyptian temples the Christian iconoclasts, when tired with hacking and hewing at the symbolic figures incised in the chambers of imagery, and defacing the most prominent features OF THE MONUMENTS, FOUND THEY COULD NOT DIG OUT THE HIEROGLYPHICS, AND TOOK TO COVERING them over with plaster; and this plaster, intended to hide the meaning and stop the mouth of the stone word, has served to preserved the ancient writings as fresh in hue and sharp in outline as when they were first cut and colored." Similarly, he continues, the temples were invaded and taken over "by connivance of Roman power." But these temples were enduring, "not built but quarried out the solid rock." The Europeans covered the front of these temples with white stucco and later reopened them as Christian churches. "And all the time each nook and corner was darkly alive with the presence and proofs of the earlier gods, even though the hieroglyphics remained unread. But stucco is not for lasting wear ; it cracks and crumbles, sloughs off, and slinks away into its natal insignificance; the rock is the sole true foundation, the rock is the record in which we reach reality at last." The stone indeed was the truth, and like the truth, it endured; but the plaster was a lie, and lies never have permanence. All the lies and layers of lies perpetrated and refined by successive generations of dishonest Europeans are fated for the same destiny as the stucco plaster. The willful, systematic destruction of Africoid art has also occurred in the Americas, Asia and India Inscriptions and hieroglyphics are defaced or bleached, Africoid noses are shot off or chiseled down, confusing nomenclatures are pasted over the evidence, photos are taken from misleading angles or filters, and often, Africoid evidence is outright destroyed. In temples and monuments of great beauty and durability where destruction was less desirable than claiming the achievements as their own, Europeans replaced the Afrikan inscriptions with new ones which credited themselves for the achievement. . . Page 25 . "Hand in hand with the enslavement of African people came the destruction of African civilization and the loss of a culture, which the European would later say never existed." 1 Dr. John Henrik Clarke states, "There has been a deliberate destruction of African culture and the records relating to that culture. This destruction started with the first invaders of Africa. It continued through the period of slavery and the colonial system. It continues today on a much higher and more dangerous level. There are now attempts on the highest academic level to divide African history and culture within Africa in such a manner that the best of it can be claimed for Europeans, or at the very least, Asians. That is the main purpose of the Hamitic and the Semitic hypothesis in relationship to African history.'" 2 The Rosetta Stone unlocked Kamit's ancient lost suppressed language Europeans tried with all their might to destroy the evidence of Black Egypt's legacy and its originating role in world civilization and religion. They almost succeeded. They burned major libraries of Afrikan archives, destroyed countless temples, killed countless people. They turned Egypt the Land of Light, into the Land of Darkness. Had it not been for the discovery of the Rosetta Stone in 1799, Kamit's early history and astounding legacy would have remained buried in the ruins of its demolished temples. The Rosetta Stone was a slab of black basalt stone was found by accident (nothing really happens "by accident") in 1799 by French troops digging trenches near Rosetta, Egypt. Carved on it was an inscription duplicated in three languages: Egyptian sacred hieroglyphics, demotic Egyptian characters, and Greek. By comparing the Greek translation with the Egyptian, the French linguist, Jean Champollion in 1822, discovered the vital clue to translating the Metu Neter (Writing of the Gods), the mysterious sacred hieroglyphics of Kamit (ancient Egypt). For the first time in modern history, it became possible to decipher the mysterious, unknown, sacred language of Egypt. "And so the lost history of old Egypt began to unfold before the eyes of an astonished world...Until the discovery of the Rosetta Stone, the history of the Land of Ham had remained buried in the ruins of the Nile Valley produced there by the Roman Army...The fanatical Romanists that buried that now famous Rosetta Stone never dreamed that the day would come when it would rise up from its grave and become the Nemesis of their beloved institution, which so greatly fears the purging effect of the Light of Knowledge." 3 HISTORY IS BLACK RELIGION  share this to friends . .

JESUS WAS A BLACK PERSON

HIS SUPERIOR MAJESTY KING GOODWILL ZWELITHINI

HIS MAJESTY KING GOODWILL ZWELITHINI

THIS IS WHAT KING ZWELITHINI SAID .
"It's painful to me when I look at this country that our forefathers and thousands of our people fought for, become a criminal den. There is nothing more painful to me. I don't sleep thinking about these things. Thats, what kind of people God has placed me amongst, who don't listen. I often ask myself if this is the freedom that King Cetshwayo and Mamonga, who was honoured when the ANC was formed in 1912? Is this the freedom? I'm talking about something that was written down. Don't think I talking politics. I'm not talking politics, no. I'm merely reciting history. I'm not politicising, but King Dinuzulu and King Cetshwayo were imprisoned for their fight for the freedom which the people received in 1994. But in 2015, we are talking about South Africans as people who don't want to listen, who don't want to work, who are thieves, who rape children, house breakers, lazy people who don't want to work the land. They are people when if other nations look at them will say let's go and eat the inheritance of the stupid people. As I'm talking to you now, there are all sorts of things hanging outside the stores. They brought untidiness to our streets, it's filthy. You can't even see what these stores were...foreigne??rs in these areas. I know sometimes it's difficult for politicians to speak out against these things because bad doers become voters after five years. Leaders, forgive me but in this situation, I must speak. As someone who doesn't have to wait five years...as Zulu King... a nation that is respected world-wide because of its role in the fight for the liberation of Africa, I won't keep quiet when people who have no say are playing with this country. The time is now for us to have a say. I would like to ask the South African government to help us. We must deal with our own lice. In our heads, let's take out the ants and leave them in the sun. We ask that immigrants must take their bags and go where they come from.

ORIGINAL CHRISTIANITY BY PPLE OF KHEMET

 MAAT GOD

Principles of Maat 2000 years before Ten Commandment Ten Commandments, eight of them at least, were taken from the Egyptian Principles of Ma’at written at least 2000 years earlier.
180px-maatsvg.png Written at least 2,000 years before the Ten Commandments of Moses, the 42 Principles of Ma’at are one of Africa’s, and the world’s, oldest sources of moral and spiritual instruction. Ma’at, the Ancient Egyptian divine Principle of Truth, Justice, and Righteousness, is the foundation of natural and social order and unity. Ancient Africans developed a humane system of thought and conduct which has been recorded in volumes of African wisdom literature, such as, these declarations from the Book of Coming Forth By Day (the so-called Book of the Dead), The Teachings of Ptah-Hotep, the writings of Ani, Amenemope, Merikare, and others.
…
One aspect of ancient Egyptian funerary literature which often is mistaken for a codified ethic of Ma’at is Chapter 125 of the Book of the Dead, often called the 42 Declarations of Purity or the Negative Confession. These declarations varied somewhat from tomb to tomb, and so can not be considered a canonical definition of Ma’at. Rather, they appear to express each tomb owner’s individual conception of Ma’at, as well as working as a magical absolution (misdeeds or mistakes made by the tomb owner in life could be declared as not having been done, and through the power of the written word, wipe that particular misdeed from the afterlife record of the deceased).
Many of the lines are similar, however, and they can help to give the student a “flavor” for the sorts of things which Ma’at governed—essentially everything from the most formal to the most mundane aspect of life.
Many versions are given on-line, unfortunately seldom do they note the tomb from which they came or, whether they are a collection from various different tombs. – wiki
Here is one collection to give you the general idea:
File:Moses bas-relief in the U.S. House of Representatives chamber.jpg
Moses marble bas-relief, one of 23 reliefs of great historical lawgivers in the chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives in the United States Capitol. Sculpted by Jean de Marco in 1950. Diameter 28 inches. He’s very pale and has a beard.
I have not done iniquity.
I have not robbed with violence.
I have not stolen.
I have not made any to suffer pain.
I have not defrauded offerings.
I have done no murder nor bid anyone to slay on my behalf.
I have not trimmed the measure.
I have not spoken lies I have not robbed God.
I have not caused the shedding of tears.
I have not dealt deceitfully.
I have not acted guilefully.
I have not laid waste to the land.
I have not set my lips against anyone.
I have not been angry or wrathful without a just cause.
I have not lusted nor defiled the wife of any man.
I have not polluted myself.
I have not caused terror.
I have not done that which is abominable.
I have not multiplied words exceedingly.
I have never uttered fiery words.
I have not judged hastily.
I have not transgressed nor have I vexed or angered God.
I have not stopped my ears against the words of Right and Truth .
I have not burned with rage.
I have not worked grief.
I have not acted with insolence.
I have not avenged myself.
I have not stirred up strife.
I have not been an eavesdropper.
I have not wronged the people
I have done no harm nor have I done evil
I have not worked treason.
I have never fouled the water.
I have not spoken scornfully.
I have never cursed God.
I have not behaved with arrogance.
I have not envied or craved for that which belongs to another.
I have not filched food from the mouth of the infant.
I have done no hurt unto man, nor wrought harm unto beasts.
I have never magnified my condition beyond what was fitting.
Here is a different translation showing how they correlate with the 10 commandments. Moses, if he existed, (there is no undisputed historical/archaeological evidence that he did), was an Egyptian. According to stories, he was adopted by an Egyptian royal family. If that were true he would have been familiar with these principles. If there was no historical Moses, then others most likely borrowed a few if the Principles of Maat when composing the Ten Commandments.
THE 42 COMMANDMENTS OF ANCIENT EGYPT
I. Thou shalt not kill, nor bid anyone kill.
II. Thou shalt not commit adultery or rape.
III. Thou shalt not avenge thyself nor burn with rage.
IV. Thou shalt not cause terror.
V. Thou shalt not assault anyone nor cause anyone pain.
VI. Thou shalt not cause misery.
VII. Thou shalt not do any harm to man or to animals.
VIII. Thou shalt not cause the shedding of tears.
IX. Thou shalt not wrong the people nor bear them any evil intent.
X. Thou shalt not steal nor take that which does not belong to you.
XI. Thou shalt not take more than thy fair share of food.
XII. Thou shalt not damage the crops, the fields, or the trees.
XIII. Thou shalt not deprive anyone of what is rightfully theirs.
XIV. Thou shalt not bear false witness, nor support false allegations.
XV. Thou shalt not lie, nor speak falsely to the hurt of another.
XVI. Thou shalt not use fiery words nor stir up any strife.
XVII. Thou shalt not speak or act deceitfully to the hurt of another.
XVIII. Thou shalt not speak scornfully against others.
XIX. Thou shalt not eavesdrop.
XX. Thou shalt not ignore the truth or words of righteousness.
XXI. Thou shalt not judge anyone hastily or harshly.
XXII. Thou shalt not disrespect sacred places.
XXIII. Thou shalt cause no wrong to be done to any workers or prisoners.
XXIV. Thou shalt not be angry without good reason.
XXV. Thou shalt not hinder the flow of running water.
XXVI. Thou shalt not waste the running water.
XXVII. Thou shalt not pollute the water or the land.
XXVIII. Thou shalt not take God’s name in vain.
XXIX. Thou shalt not despise nor anger God.
XXX. Thou shalt not steal from God.
XXXI. Thou shalt not give excessive offerings nor less than what is due.
XXXII. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s goods.
XXXIII. Thou shalt not steal from nor disrespect the dead.
XXXIV. Thou shalt remember and observe the appointed holy days.
XXXV. Thou shalt not hold back the offerings due God.
XXXVI. Thou shalt not interfere with sacred rites.
XXXVII. Thou shalt not slaughter with evil intent any sacred animals.
XXXVIII. Thou shalt not act with guile or insolence.
XXXIX. Thou shalt not be unduly proud nor act with arrogance.
XL. Thou shalt not magnify your condition beyond what is appropriate.
XLI. Thou shalt do no less than your daily obligations require.
XLII. Thou shalt obey the law and commit no treason.